"And if reality weren’t permeated by anomalies, what good is it after all?"

reality, permeated, anomalies, good...

those would be apt tags if one was to tag such a statement as if it were a video on youtube. instead they are the key words (note the separation of "key" and "word" as to differentiate from "keywords" - why? i can't legibly explain, but it makes some sort of negligible difference to me) from the title statement as originally penned by the great academic, dr. brikena ribaj, which stand out to me. personal reality is based primarily upon what our brain expects, like when one sees words which are not in a text or when one cannot find his/her keys because our brain views mostly small portions of what it expects and fills in the gaps with other expectations based on experience, knowledge of things considered to be facts and the like, which is why key words are so important. they're kinda like soundbites in that respect, only even more minute. considering these things together (what our brain allows us to witness and the anomalies that disturb that plan), this statement is quite keen. the anomalies shake up what one normally expects, and by doing so, they make life infinitely more interesting. it is when these anomalies become non-anomalies that they are absorbed into the brain as expectations, thus rendering them less interesting or less significant in the standard reality...